Department of Computer Science Worcester Polytechnic Institute

One of the goals of this course is to give you a good understanding of the open research problems in Augmented Reality.

The summaries you will submit should be more than just a recap of the contents of the paper. You should also give your analysis of the work presented. Did the authors make convincing arguments? Is the paper still relevant, or is it dated? Can you think of extensions to the work they present? Is there anything you would do differently?

1. Bush, V. (1945) As We May Think, The Atlantic.
2. Feiner, S.K. (2002) Augmented Reality: A New Way of Seeing, Scientific American, 286(4), pp. 34-41.
3. Billinghurst, M., Poupyrev, I., Kato, H., May, R. (2000) Mixing Realities in Shared Space: An Augmented Reality Interface for Collaborative Computing, Proc. of the IEEE Int'l Conf. on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1641-1644.
4. Uchiyama H., Saito H. (2011) Random Dot Markers, Proc. of IEEE VR 2011, pp. 35-38.
5. Gabbard, J.L., Swan, J.E. (2008) Usability Engineering for Augmented Reality: Employing User-Based Studies to Inform Design, IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(3), pp.513-525, May-June 2008
6. Mine, M., van Baar, J., Grundhofer, A., Rose, D. (2012) Projection-Based Augmented Reality in Disney Theme Parks, IEEE Computer, 45(7), pp. 32-40.
7. Newcombe, R.A., Davison, A.J., Izadi, S., Kohli, P., Hilliges, O., Shotton, J., Molyneaux, D., Hodges, S., Kim, D., Fitzgibbon, A. (2011) KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking, Proc. of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 23-29.
8. Microsoft Video of KinectFusion
9. YouTube video of KinectFusion
10. McIlroy, P., Izadi, S., Fitzgibbon, A. (2012) Kinectrack: Agile 6-DoF tracking using a projected dot pattern, Proc. of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 23-29.